How difficult is it to be LBGT in your country?
The rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people all over the world are wildly varied.
While same-sex marriages were recently made legal in the UK, Uganda this year passed an anti-homosexuality bill. And as Finland decides to use homoerotic artist Tom of Finland's work on a new set of stamps, shocking footage from Russia revealed disturbing methods used by homophobic groups.
On May 17, hundreds of events will take place worldwide for the International Day Against Homophobia and Transphobia. The Guardian has a page where you can make your comments or read about the joy and pain that our brothers and sisters face across the world (see the link below)
https://witness.theguardian.com/assignment/535e45e4e4b094ccf58ee3b6?INTCMP=mic_233059
Here are a couple of comments..... please dip into the article and look at the comments. Mostly they are from gay and lesbian people but there are some TG comments...
Considering homosexuality was illegal until (frighteningly) the early 90s, Irish attitudes have changed immeasureably in the period since then - even among older, more conservative types. There is alot of public support for the planned referendum on marriage equality next year (roughly 75%). Obviously it is not perfect, with (usually worded so as not to be blatant) homophobic comments spouted by the usual suspects - church, christian / right-wing commentators etc etc. But the fact that the attitudes of the vast majority have changed so much so fast is something to be celebrated.
I'm transgender person who live and work simultaneously in UK and Poland. In PL I have to work in my old mode, fortunately in London I can be myself. It's big difference and no wonder that so many people have left such homophobic country as Poland. In true Poland doesn't respect LGBT people and has to make up much.
Russian officials have banned fans from staging a parade in honour of Eurovision winner Conchita Wurst. Citing the risk of violence and the need to "respect morality", Moscow's security department denied an application for the Conchita Wurst March of Bearded Women and Men, which was due to take place on 27 May
Wurst, the drag persona of Austria's Thomas Neuwirth, has become an icon for Europe's LGBTQ community and a flashpoint for Russia's debate over gay rights. So while the singer has her share of fans - she won 290 points in the Eurovision final - the proposed parade was a piece of hirsute political theatre. "The march of bearded people ... will [be] a trial balloon in our relations with the Moscow mayor's office this year," Nikolay Alexeyev, founder of Moscow Pride, recently told GayRussia.ru.
On Thursday, a representative for Moscow's security department announced that the parade had been rejected.
To read more on this ....see link http://www.theguardian.com/music/2014/may/16/eurovision-conchita-wurst-parade-russia-ban
My third source is The Engineer - an unlikley source you may think to promote LGBT tolerance.....till you think about how a previous CEO of BP hid his homosexuality, was still hounded by the UK gutter press, somuch so that he lied in court and eventually resigned. Maybe the cockup in the Gulf of Mexico would not have happened if he had still been there?
A person’s sexuality or gender identity shouldn’t be an issue in a workplace in 21st century Britain (or really in any workplace). Yet while the engineering sector frequently engages in self-scrutiny over the working environment it creates for women, virtually no consideration has been given to engineers who happen to be lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender (LGBT).
This week saw what will hopefully be the start of a process to address that issue, as the Royal Academy of Engineering convened an event to discuss what engineering firms could do to provide a better environment for their LGBT employees and, crucially, why it was worth their while to do so.
There’s no hard evidence to suggest that LGBT people who work in engineering suffer greater prejudice than those in any other sector. But the problem is there’s virtually no evidence about their experiences at all, so even if there were issues of bullying, harassment or fear, we wouldn’t know about them.
In the most recent Workplace Equality Index compiled by LGB charity Stonewall, less than 0.5 per cent of respondents to the employee survey worked for engineering firms (compared to around 20 per cent of all workers in the country).
Those engineering companies that chose to take part in the index represented just six out of the 319 participating firms, five of them in the energy sector and none of them in the top 100 (although other organisations that employ engineers, such as IBM, several universities and the Army, were more successful).
Other sectors that are often seen to compete for engineering graduates, such as financial and professional services, performed much better in the index. When it comes to ensuring an inclusive working environment and studying potential problems for LGBT employees, it appears engineering is a step behind.
So why does this matter? With anti-discrimination laws, almost (but not entirely) equal legal status for same-sex couples and the greater levels of tolerance towards LGBT people that Britain generally enjoys today, why do engineering firms need to start thinking more about their LGBT staff?
Firstly, people do their best work when they feel comfortable and secure in their workplace. Bullying of any kind is obviously an issue in this sense, but if an employee feels they can’t be honest about who they are, that they cannot discuss important problems, or that they will suffer prejudice if they are open about a major part of their life, it will inevitably affect their relationships with colleagues and likely the quality of their work.
Secondly, at a time when many engineering firms are struggling to recruit and many of the best engineering graduates are choosing to work elsewhere, any issues that may put good engineers off from joining the sector must be addressed. If any engineer wants to go into finance for the money then they will, but if an LGBT person is weighing up different options and they’re worried about how they will be treated in engineering it will likely become a lot less attractive.
And finally, as Royal Academy of Engineering chief executive Philip Greenish put it, it’s just the right thing to do. If we believe that people should be free to be happy in their personal lives, whatever their sexual orientation or gender identity, allowing them to suffer at work as a result is a failure.
Engineering is just at the start of addressing this issue, but some firms are already forging ahead and working out how they can not only ensure the welfare of their LGBT staff but also how this can directly improve their business.
Representatives from BP and Arup told the Royal Academy of Engineering audience how their efforts to create LGBT networks and support groups, to get senior management to demonstrate their commitment to LGBT staff welfare and even making sure all staff use appropriate language had made a difference. BP had also found it could use the enthusiasm of its LGBT groups, now renamed “business resource groups” to help its recruitment efforts.
The attempt to create an environment where staff felt comfortable enough to discuss LGBT issues internally was particularly important for the two companies as they operated in numerous countries where homosexuality or transgenderism was either not culturally tolerated or illegal, and where LGBT staff may risk prejudice by working there.
BP, in particular, was quick to admit it didn’t have all the answers and that it was still developing its approach. The only worrying thing about the presentation was BP’s failure to mention probably the most famous LGBT person in engineering, its former chief executive Lord Browne, whose career at the company came to an end when he lied in court about aspects of his personal life.
Though BP would undoubtedly say the company has moved on since Lord Browne’s era (as indeed the whole country has), his experience should serve as a warning of the potential consequences of forcing someone to hide who they are.
The key message from the evening was that more must now be done to address this issue. The absence of any specific reference to engineers who are transgender (of whom there were several in the audience) is a good indicator of this. The negative stories need to be shared so problems can be identified. And of course, SMEs will have entirely different needs, resources and experiences to the likes of BP and Arup.
Most importantly it’s time for engineering to start talking about this topic and to start educating itself. It’s not enough to say a person’s sexuality or gender identity is their own business and doesn’t need to be discussed at work. People need to feel they can be themselves and that their employer will listen if they have a problem. As Arup engineer Emmeline Tang put it: tolerance is just enduring someone’s existence; it’s not the same as acceptance.
To read the original article here is the link, and I make no apology for copying and pasting it in full. It shows that, at least in the UK, mainstream society is becoming more tolerant in many ways.
http://www.theengineer.co.uk/channels/skills-and-careers/opinion/why-engineering-must-start-addressing-its-sexuality-issue/1018573.article?cmpid=tenews_286021
May 27, 2014- -
-
Report
May 27, 2014- -
-
1 likes this
- -
-
Report
May 27, 2014- -
-
1 likes this
- -
-
Report
May 27, 2014- -
-
1 likes this
- -
-
Report